用WS造句子，“WS”造句

這與WS調用特別有關係，在WS調用中，由於契約在本質上是基於ASCII的，因此增加了交換的細節。

(in all candor, I am the IBM technical lead and co-editor of the WS-ReliableMessaging specification, so I might be a little biased).

This architecture USES WS-Security to provide end-to-end security and possibly non-repudiation (if the service persists the inbound message before removing security).

Then the WS-I BP group decided to make even more changes to the WSDL schema, so it created what appears to be the best-practices version of this slippery schema.

Further discussion of this WS Security feature is beyond the scope of this introductory guide.

If you want to start from a clean workspace, import the WS response template final interchange project.

In other words, we are replacing the resource properties document with a JSON object and using HTTP methods in lieu of WS-RP methods.

我們現在將通過一個簡單的示例來説明在沒有此功能的情況下WS - RM端點為何不能完成其工作。

此體系結構使用WS - Security來提供端到端安全和可能的不可否認*(如果服務在刪除安全前保存入站消息)。

Only an initial WS-Routing sender may insert a rev element for describing the reverse message path.

A Profile conformance Report can also be created from the WS-I Testing Tool Analyzer to document a conformance claim in your WSDL documents.

So, sometimes, to make this point in email messages, we've been saying "JAX-WS RI + Tango".

The failure message is self explanatory: "use=encoded" in the soapbind:body, soapbind:fault, soapbind:header or soapbind:headerfault is not considered conformant to the WS-I Profile.

Some people think that Tango is a different stack than our JAX-WS RI stack.

失敗消息是自我解釋的：soapbind:body、soapbind:fault、soapbind:header或soapbind:headerfault 中的 "use=encoded"被認為是不遵守 WS-I 規範的。

標準規範的定義是WS -CIM小組應完成的任務。

坦白地講，我是IBM技術領導人，也是WS - ReliableMessaging規範的編輯，因此我可能有點偏心。